Who certified the "organic certification"?

According to industry sources, some suppliers change their packaging to organic products, and most organic foods do not meet organic standards. The organic food certification organization said that it would pay a fee of 18,500 yuan and it would be ready for approval in one month. (October 16 "Guangzhou Daily")

A "dental defense group" fell, countless "dental defense groups" stood up, and organic food certification was "dental defense grouping." "Organic certification" of food turns into "rich certification" and is more dangerous than certification of toothpaste by the "dental defense group". Non-organic agricultural products with harmful substances such as pesticides, fertilizers and heavy metals are sold at high prices after being labelled as "organic". Consumers are not only losing money but also health.

A box of 100 grams of cabbage seedlings is priced at 18 yuan, a catty of rice is sold for more than 50 yuan, and a bag of 500 grams of red dates is 98 yuan. "Organic food" is generally 5-10 times more expensive than regular food, which is why food The producer knows that the other party is a Ligue and still is willing to pay a high price to buy organic certification marks. The collusion between the two parties in the certification will eventually be paid by the consumer. This is a cruel reality.

According to the relevant technical specifications, organic foods must absolutely prohibit the use of artificial synthetic substances such as pesticides, chemical fertilizers, and herbicides during production and processing, and have high requirements for the environmental quality of soil, air, and water. Nowadays, China's agricultural production, processing, storage, and transportation methods can strictly meet these requirements. It can be described as rare; otherwise, some agencies do not have to use special food. In other words, the "organic food" that people buy at high prices from stores every day is almost spent on the princess's money.

Just because organic foods are not easily available, certification is required. On the one hand, certification, on the one hand, encourages enterprises to promote organic food production through economic means—products with higher prices after certification; on the other hand, it satisfies consumers’ right to know and choose. This is a great thing for the benefit of the country and the people, and it is also an international common practice. Why did we not get accustomed to this when we come to us?

The reason is not complicated. In the present stage where integrity is not respected and the cost of untrustworthiness is not high, enterprises must be certified not to be tempted by interests, and integrity should be regarded as life. The relevant standards should be strictly enforced, and certification should be performed earnestly, like S&P. Even the government does not give face, it is difficult. In the fierce competition with the industry and unhealthy market demand (manufacturing companies require false evidence), as long as there is a certified company only profit, and lose professional ethics, there will be bad money to drive out the good currency phenomenon, other companies are either contaminated, or trapped in situ .

Organic food certification adopts market-oriented operation. Organic certification organizations are all independent civil organizations. The direction is correct. The government that can be provided by the market will not intervene. The other side of the matter is that it is not right for the children to care for the children. The so-called "children do not teach, the Father does." When morality became the epitaph of morality, the law-abiding enterprises were unable to move in a position where the lack of morality became a pass for those who lacked morality. The enterprises of the transaction of cash exchanges flourished, and the double twists of value and guidance indicated that the government's failure was supervised. . In this regard, the government must take responsibility for supervision and governance. On the one hand, it rationalizes relevant mechanisms and positively encourages law-abiding businesses; on the other, it severely punishes black sheep and drives them out of the certification market.